Why so frou-frou???

There’s something that’s bugged me ever since the original Prius debuted: Why do energy efficient vehicles often look so wimpy? They are often odd looking to an extreme. I wonder if this is because the manufacturers want to make sure their new product category is noticed or if it is because owners of these vehicles seem to have a need to proclaim to the world, “Look at me! I’m ecologically better than you!”Mitsubishi I-MiEVSmart EVAptera (now defunct)I know that “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder,” but aren’t there some absolutes in visual appeal? Perhaps not. Perhaps concessions to aerodynamics dictate a perfect shape. The Tesla Model S is touted for having a very low coefficient of drag, even lower than the Toyota Prius. See? Efficient doesn’t necessarily mean ugly.

But aesthetics are definitely not universal. My friend Charles and I disagree on almost every single EV. I think the Cadillac ELR is beautiful and he thinks it’s ugly. He thinks the Nissan Leaf is attractive and its looks repulse me (sorry Nissan). Admittedly, the Leaf was the very first EV I ever drove and I was ready to write a check for the down payment, on the spot. I liked the performance and what an electric vehicle meant to me enough to overlook the Leaf’s ugliness. (For all you Leaf owners out there, this is just my opinion. Don’t be offended. Continue reading…)Nissan Leaf

I mean really?!?! Which of these two do you find more visually appealing?Cadillac ELR

Another friend, Kelly was recently looking to move into a plug-in vehicle. Like me, she found the aesthetics of the Leaf lacking (to put it mildly). Her choices came down to two decidedly different vehicles, the Chevrolet Volt and the BMW i3. She had driven my Volt previously and came to Classic Chevrolet to test drive the latest model. She also drove the i3 that was loaned to My Electric Vehicle Journey by BMW of Arlington‘s EV champion, Pedro Alicea. We had borrowed it for a video test drive and review (I swear it’s coming soon…). She liked both vehicles, but ended up opting for the i3 because Pedro was able to get her a lower lease payment (Don’t ask me how. I’m still in shock). On most EV’s, Kelly and I have similar tastes. How she could stand the looks of the i3 will be explained in the review…Chevrolet VoltThe Volt vs. the BMW i3… Really Kelly?!? 😉BMW i3I know that for EV adoption to happen, the people who do not currently know about EVs have to become aware of them. EVs have to make an impression and be noticed. But the more, for lack of a better term, “funky” looking vehicles, can also turn people away from considering any EV. Many people, noticing only those odd-looking EVs, might assume EVs all look that way and never explore deeper to find ones that are more mainstream in appearance.

Before I got a Volt, I never really noticed them. To me, they looked like a Cruze and, in fact, were often disparaged by the conservative media as a $40K Cruze. We all know that’s not the case (if you don’t know, go test drive both). I often confuse the Nissan Versa and Leaf. Quite often, even as much as I’ve been around EVs, the Ford Fusion, when seen at a distance,looks like a Tesla Model S to me.Ford FusionSeparated at birth? Please Model S owners, do not regale me with protestations! I did say from a distance, but…Tesla Model SSo I understand the marketing motivation of funky and I concede that some people, like my buddy Charles, may actually prefer funky. But the very definition of funky is outside the mainstream and probably unappealing to the masses needed for EVs to succeed.

My message to the EV manufacturers is, there are other ways to stand out than fugliness! One is badging and decals. The rear end of every Leaf has an emblem stating “Zero emission.” Imagine a driver, stuck in rush hour traffic, seeing that…Leaf BadgeThe only thing on my Volt, that lets anyone know it uses electricity, is the lightning bolt in the logo. In fact, GM offers a wrap package for the Volt to show off that it’s electric…sort of. The problem is, it costs extra to advertise for GM! Really??? Why don’t you include the graphic and have an optional charge to remove it? Why not offer it at no charge or even discount the Volt fifty bucks if someone adds the wrap?Volt Logo Wrap

As an EV owner will tell you, we all get approached by people with questions about our EVs, once they realize our vehicle is electric. That takes someone that is aware of EVs to some extent already. If you want to reach more potential customers, make the fact that they’re electric more prominent.

One other thing GM: Don’t allow the most widely seen commercial, featuring the Volt, be a Met Life commercial! ADVERTISE!!!!Met Life CommercialNow some EVs are inspirers of lust The ones that immediately come to mind are:

BMW i8BMW i8

Tesla RoadsterTesla RoadsterCan’t anyone make an EV or plug-in hybrid that has the looks of these beauties at a price affordable for those currently buying other EVs? We don’t need the futuristic doors. We just want to look sporty at a decent price.

Here’s a tip: The first company that does this, gets rich beyond the dreams of avarice.

 

About the author

An accidental EVangelist: On my way to work at Apple one morning, my car was rear-ended (and totaled) by an SUV, driven by a guy playing with his smartphone.
This led me to get my first plug-in vehicle.
I started blogging about my experiences immediately.
A year later, in 2013, I was hired by the dealership as their "EVangelist."
I became a board member with the Texas Electric Transportation Resources Alliance (www.TxETRA.org) and perform public speaking in the DFW area regarding electric vehicles and environmental issues.
I also teach others how to sell plug-in vehicles or manage EV sales.
I'm on a mission.

Comments

  1. The original Honda Insight looked different at least partly for aerodynamics, but I think it’s lack of sales pushed the main stream industry away from offering a super efficient range extended EV. Perhaps when sales volumes increase there will be more demand for something equivalent.

    1. Definitely, the shape of EVs will inform their shape. However, as we’ve seen with the Model S and even the Volt, aerodynamics and style can coexist. I loved the Volt concept car shown at auto shows. I thought it was a MUCH cooler design. Unfortunately, it wasn’t aerodynamic and the Volt’s back half was redesigned after months of wind tunnel testing. The changes made resulted in three more miles of electric range, which was about a 9% increase. The flat wedge shape of the Insight and the Prius, in my opinion, represent a lack of three dimensional thinking. Both designs could be analyzed as a two-dimensional cross section. The Model S, on the other hand, because of its compound curvatures would have to use modern computational fluid dynamics analysis tools to accurately gauge the ‘slipperiness.’ I also think the rear wheel well covers on the original Insight were something the American market is still not ready to accept. I know I’m not.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 + four =

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.